"Abductions" DO NOT exist :They are misinterpreted sleep phenomena
Red at Pantheon.Global
Red at Pantheon.Global
Sat Apr 11 11:34:26 EST 1998
(Don P.) esoxlNeodymium at juno.com@ wrote:
> My theory:
> With or without Mr. ET, humans have been developing very
>efficient disc aircraft since the 1930's.
> The facts:
> Some of inventions of Nicola Tesla technology involved
>devices that could not be explained by modern physics. Tesla
>was not a physicist and did not attempt to work out the math
>for his devices, but some of the devices that he *played* with
>IMO utilized Unified Field Theories. There are many books on
>Tesla technology check it out yourself.
Actually, this is a good place for you to introduce us to them.
> Hans Coler devices from 1925 and 1933, the Stromerzeuger and
>Magnetstromapparat respectively. Today there is still no answer
>from *modern* science why these devices produced more energy
>output than apparent input.
> The work of T.J.J. See and his extensive work on the Unified
>Field Thoeries from the early 1920's, that was ignored by the
>mainstream scientific community.
> The work starting in the 1930's and later by Victor Schauberger.
>Schriever, Dr. Miethe, the Hortens, and John Searl, and maybe even
>T.T. Brown. All these men worked on developing disc aircraft.
> Advances in Unified Field Theories would have two MAJOR
> 1) Virtually free (very very inexpensive) energy
> 2) Anti-Gravity
And one serious problem. The speed with which the energy can flow through
the ZPE field to replace energy used.
All the free energy devices cause dimples in space time as they create
gravity fields. Put this tech in commercial use and the very gravity well
of the earth could become poisoned.
It might very well create a constantly deepening gravity well around the
earth as the energy in the ZPE field was used faster than new energy
could flow in. So the orbital mechanics of earth/moon system might well
There are serious concerns that make suppression of this tech for
commercial use a rational decision.
>not to mention the applications torwards defensive and offensive
> The thousands of credible disc aircraft sightings that have
>been witnessed AFTER WW2 (no need for Mr. ET).
> This is just a start. There is much more circumstantial
>evidence that point to HUMANS as the culprits of the UFO
>phenomenon, BUT proponents and skeptics alike choose
>to ignore these facts and contiune to blather about Mr. ET.
> To the ETH proponent:
> Why is it that Mr. ET can develope such incredible disc
>crafts and humans cannot??!!
> To the UFO Skeptic:
> Have you not investigated the HUMAN endeavor in the
>development of disc aircraft and Unified Field Theories
>that started at the turn of this century??!!
> You want the facts of the UFO phenomenon, start in 1864
>with Maxwell's equations (which unified magnetisim and
>electicity), and work your way up following the works of
>some brilliant but not so famous individuals. The names
>listed above are just a few.
> What would humans have to gain by keeping this
Prevent earth's orbit from changing.
> What or whom would the blame be put on for the
>sightings of these human built craft?
> If one has to spend more that 2 seconds contemplating
>the answers to these questions, then you deserve to be
>blathering about Mr. ET. Step aside and watch the story
>unfold. Even *if* Mr. ET is visiting, I say WHO CARES!
>It is the technology that is important, it is the tehcnology
>that can benefit the inhabitants of this planet, and not the
>facts regarding the origins of man.
Except that they are eating us, and doing unnatural things to our cattle.
> Thanks for the query Furbelly.
Pantheon Global-USA <http://www.angelfire.com/tx/USofTexas
Are you a single man with an adventurer's spirit? You may be
interested in Pantheon's Single Gentlemen's Adventurer's Club.
There's an e-mail link at the bottom of the homepage.
More information about the Neur-sci