Rickert on embedded computation (was re: science of consciousness.)

Neil Rickert rickert at cs.niu.edu
Thu Apr 30 09:59:46 EST 1998

patrick at gryphon.psych.ox.ac.uk (Patrick Juola) writes:
>In article <6i88a8$j7g at ux.cs.niu.edu> rickert at cs.niu.edu (Neil Rickert) writes:
>>andersw+ at pitt.edu (Anders N Weinstein) writes:

>>>Formal models of computation treat *interaction* in terms of 
>>>symbols getting written onto the tape memory. This seems a 
>>>pretty good model of how the operating system code views a device. 

>>Right.  But you generally have to model this as a Turing machine with
>>oracle.  You can't model it as a plain Turing machine.  The oracle
>>places the interactive symbols on the tape in a way that is not
>>predictable from within the Turing machine model.

>But Turing machines neither need nor are expected to predict their

Bah! Humbug.

Turing machines have no input.  The data is all there on the tape
before they begin execution.

More information about the Neur-sci mailing list