Grandiosity

[kkollins at pop3.concentric.net]

CORRECTION:

I've detected the "yawning" (which ceased immediately after I posted the
msg quoted below, but began again earlier this night, and has, now,
ceased again, which "time"-frame is "curious", and, possibly, Telling),
but I =RETRACT= attribution to "folks at Concentric", and Acknowledge
that I should never have expressed such, and Submit myself to any
Consequences of having so-Misspoken. K. P. Collins

kkollins at pop3.concentric.net wrote:
> 
> And, BTW, my read is that the folks at Concentric are already Monitoring
> my posts... I use a slow machine for communications so that =any=
> "tampering" is Immediately-"Announced" to me by my machine's "Yawning"
> while I work.
> 
> It's "hilarious". I come here to Present a Gift of Understanding, get
> Jumped by some who, Plain-as-Day, work to destroy the Gift, and it's the
> one who Presents the Gift who is the one who comes under Scrutiny... [no
> smiley-face]
> 
> ...Look-and-See, such is the work of the "Beast". K. P. Collins
> 
> kkollins at pop3.concentric.net wrote:
> >
> > If anyone attacks others, in supposed correlation to what I'm doing,
> > I'll successfully defend the others... such is the only way I get
> > involved third-party-wise.
> >
> > In this matter, each person will be his/her =own= Judge. K. P. Collins
> >
> > Walter Eric Johnson wrote:
> > >
> > > F. Frank LeFever (flefever at ix.netcom.com) wrote:
> > > : Well, no comment, but maybe a question:  Collins, have you really NO
> > > : insight at all into what's happening?  Have you NO suspicion at all
> > > : about the accuracy of your beliefs?  Have you NO doubts?
> > >
> > > Ken obviously doesn't respond to reason or to being publicly
> > > ridiculed.  I only see two options left:
> > >   1) ignore him (appropriate considering the extent of his
> > >      ignorance)
> > >   2) complain to Concentric
> > >
> > > Eric Johnson