F. Frank LeFever
flefever at ix.netcom.com
Sun Dec 13 20:07:01 EST 1998
Stupidly, he assumed he knew what the term "unilateral neglect" meant,
and when his error was pointed out his "invincible ignorance" precluded
his learning from the experience. "Unilateral neglect" (do a Medline
search on it, please) is the term used in hundreds of
scientific/medical articles to refer to the complex phenomena of
lateralized inattention after focal neurological damage (e.g.
right-parietal stroke). It has NOTHING to do with "child abuse" or
"child neglect". Ignorant is ignorant. God help the child that
depends on such a stupid "protector"!
In <3671FE2D.F36D8CD at pop3.concentric.net> kkollins at pop3.concentric.net
>Oh yeah... what you say, too :-)
>But I stand on what I posted, Mr. Frank... Neglect is commonly one-way
>in the dynamics of Child Abuse... then, as the Child matures, and the
>generalized passive-active phase shift (sensory-template-dominant to
>motor-template-dominant phase shift) gains ascendency (AoK, Ap5, Ap7,
>Ap8), the Geometry of behavior "inverts", the "adult" replicates the
>abusive dynamics... an entirely-within-the-control-of-Neuroscience
>Tragedy, Perpetuated, Needlessly... Sorrowfully. K. P. Collins
>F. Frank LeFever wrote:
>> Another particularly cruel (and stupid) joke from kkollins who
>> apparently knows nothing at all about unilateral neglect but doesn't
>> hesitate to reply on the basis of his own private fantasies.
>> n.b.: I have presented some of my own research on unilateral neglect
>> meetings of the American Academy of Neurology (Boston,April 1991),
>> International Neuropsychological Society & Australian Society for
>> of Brain Impairment (Broadbeach, Australia, July 1991), and two more
>> meetings of INS (San Diego, 1992; Durham, England, July 1992).
>> (1) Unilateral neglect has nothing to do with "sensory deprivation"
>> studies (such as were fashionable 40 years ago); it is a
>> condition, usually arising from stroke, particularly right
>> stroke, and especially right parietal cortex (sometimes from frontal
>> subcortical sites, relatively rarely from left-hemisphere sites).
>> (2) Unilateral neglect is not a sensory "deprivation" or "loss", but
>> may better be described as "unilateral inattention". It may affect
>> more than one perceptual domain (e.g. visual, auditory,
>> but visual effects are most often studied. It must be distinguished
>> from hemispatial SENSORY loss such as a visual "field cut" or
>> (2) Italian researchers demonstrated 2-3 decades ago that unilateral
>> neglect can be shown in visual memory, for example ignoring
>> on the left when patients imagined a scene in their home towns; when
>> asked to imagine facing the opposite direction the previously
>> buildings were "seen" and described, whereas the previously "seen"
>> buildings (now being on the left in this view) were ignored...
>> Lorenzo: what exactly would you like to say or ask about neglect?
>> F. Frank LeFever, Ph.D.
>> New York Neuropsychology Group
>> In <36708334.CE871307 at pop3.concentric.net>
kkollins at pop3.concentric.net
>> >It's a a particularly-Cruel form of sensory-deprivation. (see my
>> >post of this evening). Cheers, Lorenzo, ken collins
>> >Lorenzo pia wrote:
>> >> Would you like to speak with me about unilateral Neglect?
>> >> --
>> >> Lorenzo Pia
>> >> E-mail lorpia at tin.it
>> >> Web page http://space.tin.it/io/lorepia
>> >> http://members.wbs.net/homepages/l/o/l/lollo4.html
More information about the Neur-sci