What is the mind?

[Stephen Paul King]

kkollins at pop3.concentric.net wrote:

>I took a look at the "Chu space" stuff, and have found that its entire
>focus [concurrent processing] was Reified within my own self-published
>work as of 1980. K. P. Collins

	Where can I read your work?

>Stephen Paul King wrote:
>> 
>> "John" <johnhkm at logicworld.com.au> wrote:
>> 
>> >Incompatible may not quite be the correct word. Dualism lies beyond
>> >scientific investigation, in that sense it is incompatible. If thinkers of
>> >the calibre of Eccles and Popper "The Self and its Brain" (a failed attempt
>> >to give scientific credence to dualism) are any indication, I would be
>> >reluctant to say that being scientific entails a repudiation of dualism.
>> >Someone else can put forward the idea much better:
>> 
>> Please read:
>> 
>> http://boole.stanford.edu/chuguide.html#ratmech
>> 
>> http://boole.stanford.edu/chuguide.html#P5
>> 
>> http://boole.stanford.edu/chuguide.html#ph94
>> 
>> http://boole.stanford.edu/chuguide.html#gamut
>> 
>> http://boole.stanford.edu/chuguide.html#tppp