[Q] Consciousness ?

crosley at tcp.co.uk crosley at tcp.co.uk
Sat Jan 31 10:47:02 EST 1998


In Article<34CF08D9.5607F8AD at nuri.net>, <tyahn at nuri.net> write:
> Path: tcp.co.uk!wapping.ecs.soton.ac.uk!spruce.sucs.soton.ac.uk!server2.netnews.ja.net!btnet-peer!btnet!newsfeed.direct.ca!newshub1.home.com!news.home.com!xfer.kren.nm.kr!fnews.nuri.net!news.nuri.net!not-for-mail
> From: Tae-Young Ahn <tyahn at nuri.net>
> Newsgroups: bionet.neuroscience
> Subject: [Q] Consciousness ?
> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 19:30:49 +0900
> Organization: A-Lab, CNS, Seoul, Korea
> Lines: 23
> Message-ID: <34CF08D9.5607F8AD at nuri.net>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: ts241-196.nuri.net
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (Win95; I)
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> Xref: tcp.co.uk bionet.neuroscience:13068
> 
> Hi, all.
> 
> I have several questions about consciousness.
> 
> Can we explain consciousness as term of energy and matter ?
> 
> Or, is consciousness metaphysical problem ?
> 
> I have some articles related to perception, binding problem, and
> temporal synchronization. does this temporal coherence give us lucid
> explanation to reductionistic solution of consciousness ?
> 
> I have been baffled at above question. Plaease, help me.
> 
> 
----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
> 
> Tae-Young
> 
> "We all agree that your theory is crazy. The question which 
divides us
> is whether it is crazy enough." -- Niels Bohr
> 
> 
> 
     Try the Association for the Scientific Study of 
Consciousness
     (ASSC) at: www.phil.vt.edu/ASSC/esem.html
     or:
     Journal of Consciousness Studies, (JCS) at:
     www.zynet.co.uk./imprint
     or:
     Keith Sutherland at: keith at imprint.co.uk
     John Shaw




More information about the Neur-sci mailing list