UPJOHN'S DRUG XANAX ON TRIAL
Eric O. Troldahl
etroll at flash.spamnet
Sun Mar 22 23:58:18 EST 1998
sbharris at ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
> Here's a truth: there are no "bad drugs," --- instead, what there
>are, are bad relationships between certain people and certain drugs.
>If you need a prime example from your own experience, think of alcohol.
>If we made ethyl alcohol only available through physicians, would it
>then be reasonable for alcoholics to blame doctors? And would doctors
>then be the simple cause of all alcoholism? Gee, that sounds like a
>good proposal, then. Except I hope you understand that there are a lot
>of things wrong it. Premises which need to be examined, and so forth.
> Steve Harris, M.D.
If a drug has a higher incidence of major side effects than clinical positive
effect, is it still a "good" drug?
Eric O. Troldahl, etroll at flash.net
Lead Proponent, rec.autos.sport.nascar.moderated
(sorry for the munged headers, I hate spam)
More information about the Neur-sci