In article <MPG.107d6c1b528bfd829899b8 at news.teleport.com>,
Larry Caldwell <larryc at teleport.com> wrote:
>In article <6uopa7$rc$1 at quine.mathcs.duq.edu>, juola at mathcs.duq.edu>says...
>>> He also didn't *DO* anything with them. I can't think of a single
>> one of the fields you mention in which there are any substantial
>> contributions made by Da Vinci, with the exception of painting, in
>> which he produced (at least) two acknowledged masterpieces.
>>Leonardo was a pretty good painter, but that wasn't his contribution to
>art. He invented vanishing point perspective, which ruled western art
>until Picasso demonstrated an alternative.
I don't believe this is the case; I believe that point perspective was
developed independently in a number of schools.
>You're right, though. Leonardo may have been the most interesting person
>to live in 1000 years, but he was far from the most influential.