In article <709g00$80a$1 at nnrp1.dejanews.com>, <mycetes at my-dejanews.com> wrote:
>In article <7033ii$v4u$1 at coranto.ucs.mun.ca>,
>n57mgb at morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Michael Gerald Burton) wrote:
>>>> Just on the whole woman of the millenium...
>>>> I would think that (Lady) Ada Lovelace would be more of a candidate than
>> any code monkey out there today. Her ideas founded, simultaneously, the
>> science of computer linguistics and the field which would eventually allow
>> the creation of a true mass-production society.
>>>> I would think that you all know of the first honor (she was working with
>> Charles Babbage). The second stems from the fact that many of her ideas
>> were eventually used in Jaquardian looms to bring greater efficiency to
>> the automating process. And Jaquardian looms were a
>> demonstration-in-practice of the practicality of the same concepts used to
>> begin Henry Ford's empire at the turn of the next century.
>>>>Ada Lovelace was not the progenitor of Computer Programming. Charles Babbage
>was. The program she published in her famous paper was a copy of a
>handwritten one which Babbage had given her for that purpose. This is more
>plainly understood if one realises that Babbage developed the programming
>language first and would have tried it out long before he would have given it
>to Ada to play with. Ada's primary role in the history of computing was to
>translate that paper, which had originally appeared in French. It was
>Babbage's idea that the English translation should contain more than the
>original French one.
Interesting. Charles Babbage, an Englishman, writes a paper in French
and has to have it translated into English for him. I must admit
that I'm skeptical about this. Do you have a reference?