THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIO-RELIGION
jimmy at jradams.demon.co.uk
Mon Aug 9 12:50:27 EST 1999
In article <uXP7eIh4#GA.244 at cpmsnbbsa02>, Ken Collins
<KPaulC at email.msn.com> writes
>Jim Balter wrote in message <37AD1C2C.7B6624B5 at sandpiper.net>...
>>It is true that it seems that way to some persons ignorant
>>of the relevant physics -- like, say, that there's a sun in the sky.
>there's not an 'atom' in the entirety of physical reality, in cluding those
>which comprise Sun, that doesn't 'see' the one-'map' that is wdb2t, and
>'behave' in rigorous accord with respect to such.
You are posting your quarrel in talk.philosophy.humanism; it has
absolutely nothing to do with us.
We have enough postings from the scientifically illiterate (and the
plain illiterate, come to that) to be going on with.
Would you be so kind as to omit us from your further fractiousness?
More information about the Neur-sci