neural timing and schizophrenia

[kenneth Collins]

Dag, decades of one-way 'communication', punctuated by pot-shots taken by
intellectual-'gunslingers', enamored with the fact that the 'opportunity' to do so
is open to them, but not caring about the fact that it's been decades of one-way
'communication', kind of makes it a bit 'unlikely' that the one-way stuff can be a
'box-office success'.

the one-way-ness is not my doing.

so, tell me, why does it exist?

or, are folks putting my Choice to try to secure that the understanding will not
be withheld from the folks on whose behalves it was done before Science?

if it's so, then there's no Science, and i guess i'll just use-myself-up standing
against such, because i will not accept that there is no Science.

ken

dag.stenberg at helsinki.nospam.fi wrote:

> \"Sir Knowitall\" <fell_followedby_in at one.net.au> wrote:
> > I have thought of a very simple way of describing (and to begin an
> > evaluation) of your "theoretical focus" (as per above).
> > I.e.:
> > Your focus is out  --- as in "out of focus" *in reference to, or in relation
> > to,* HOW and WHY nerve-systems and brains work and have been naturally
> > selected to (in most cases) have a capacity to cope with **Hibernation
> > imploring** type life-situations .....
> > Peter F
> > http://www.ozemail.com.au/~fellin/main.htm
>
> Well formulated, although it may not lead us anywhere, of course.
>
> Dag Stenberg