If you are taking a poll -- stick to strict neuroscience, broadly
defined to include physiology, biology, behavior, neurology,
biochemistry etc. as long as it is real science. E. Modestino
was exactly right.
Jason Ebaugh wrote in message <7ag6kl$k83$1 at news1.tc.umn.edu>...
>>What does the group think of posts that are definitly related to
>neuro-biology but not so much neuroscience in a strict chemical,
>synapse, curciuts kind of way. I mean specificaly the threqads on
>non-human empathy and dolphin intelligence. They have been some of
the
>most active threads on this group.
>>Just curious what peoples opinions are.
>>Edward Justin Modestino <ejmodest at sas.upenn.edu> wrote:
>>>This is a neuroscience newsgroup designed to allow neuroscientists
and
>>enthusiasts to pool resources, share information, network and get
opinions
>>from fellow neuroscientists.
