In article <7dh9hi$q82$1 at nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
hemidactylus at my-dejanews.com wrote:
> (crossposted ng's trimmed)
>> In article <7dfkop$b6j$1 at nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
>patanie at my-dejanews.com wrote:
> > Here are 2 important references for those naive and immature Anglo-Saxons
> > continue to believe in "extraterrestrial" "abductions" :
> > References:
> > Bertrand Méheust, qui fut lun des précurseurs de lanthropologie des
> > extraterrestres:
> > 1.Science-fiction et soucoupes volantes, Paris, Mercure de France, 1978 ;
> > (Science-fiction and Flying Saucers,Mercure de France editor,Paris 1978.)
> > 2.En soucoupes volantes. Vers une ethnologie des récits denlèvements,
> > Paris, Imago, 1992.
> > (Aboard Flying Saucers. Towards an Ethnology of abductees'stories.
> > Imago editor,Paris 1992,France)
>> I'm assuming these references deal with the neurobiology of UFO beliefs in
> some way, perhaps? Or is it more like the neuropsychology of imagination.
>> Has anybody compared the fMRI's of X-files watchers versus nonwatchers. Maybe
> there is relevance to Brodmann's area 51 ;-)
Bertrand Meheust has discovered something very important:that tales found
in descriptions of "ufos" of today could be found much before 1947,when UFOs
became a fashion,in science-fiction books...
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own