kenpc at banet.net wrote:
>As for your "queries", I sent you a copy of AoK.
Could you not send publish it here like some others asked before?
> And kindly, if you expect me to respond to anything more that you post,
>stick concisely to the point, without circumlocution.
I forgot how much you tend to stick to the point with conciseness.
>In the present circumstance such is unthinkably offensive.
If I wanted to be offensive a bit I'd say to:
>I stand on what I've posted.
Be careful that it does not get squeezed. ;-)
> and it's almost too late with respect to the "USSR"... thousands of nucs, and all.
That one has been worrying me for a while as well.
And not just because of the instability there, but because I can't
exclude that if out for money someone might sell a few of them.