Alan Roth wrote:
> I used to be a totally verbal thinker. One day (in 1983?) on a whim, I
> went around the office to 7 or 8 of my high-tech. co-workers and asked
> them "how" they think. In those days, that would not get you fired
> immediately--I wouldn't recommend it today. Once they understood the
> question, the answers seemed to fall about equally into two groups,
> (and, yes, I know this is a very small sample)--either they were verbal
> like me, or they thought in "pictures."
>> This was novel to me, but I taught myself to visualize concepts, even
> abstract ones--guess what--my comprehension of the world increased with
> practice and I suspect my measureable IQ has risen too--(it hasn't been
> tested recently, but one knows what things are amenable to solution and
>> I learned to switch modes, depending on the type of problem. There is no
> doubt that "a picture is worth a thousand words." It is explication for
> others that is sometimes difficult--words are so limiting and so slow.
I have had to learn visual thinking when I was in engineering school. I
even remember the decisive moment when I realized that verbal/abstract
modes of thinking will not allow me to design a simple mechanism in my
head; so I consciously started training myself to visualize mechanisms,
starting from the simplest and going on to the more complex. It still
does not come as naturally as auditory thinking to me; but I have learned
enough to enable me to function as an engineer.
Quaternion Press Publishing House
Have a math question? Ask the Quaternion at