Thinking without language?

[Peter T. Daniels]

patrik bagge wrote:
> 
> >It would be better if this whole thread on thinking WITHOUT language
> >were to simply disappear from sci.LANG ...
> 
> i might agree that crossposting isn't always such a good idea,
> but 'better' ?
> for who,why,when ?
> 
> i find it extremely rewarding to read all these bright individuals
> , coming in different flavour of belief.

For sci.lang, obviously ... I don't recognize you as a sci.lang poster;
if you're from one of the other four newsgroups this thread is going to
(is there a way to discover where it originated?), its absence here
shouldn't affect you at all.
-- 
Peter T. Daniels     grammatim at worldnet.att.net