I believe that the class of computable things is only
a subset of the class of deterministic things. It is
possible to be deterministic, but not computable.
"Frank Buckler" <fb at m2.ifb.uni-hannover.de> writes:
>> hypochristmutreefuzz <hypochristmutreefuzz at my-deja.com> schrieb in im
> Newsbeitrag: 81cmlv$r16$1 at nnrp1.deja.com...>> > I'd like to remind everybody that we don't know if Natural Language is
> > computable,
>> Computable meens deterministic.
> All science have to make the asumtion thats its object is deterministic. If
> e.g. psychology does not, it leave the scientific path and enters religion.
>> On the other hand the 1999 published book of D. Doerner contains a very
> reseanable explanation how for instands language evolves.