hi, Dag.
dag.stenberg at helsinki.nospam.fi wrote:
> In bionet.neuroscience kenneth Collins <kpaulc at earthlink.net> wrote:
> > kenneth Collins wrote:
> > take a rose bush, and 'plant' it where there's no light. despite the good DNA of the rose
> > bush, not only will one get no roses, one will lose the rose bush, all it's could-be-color,
> > all it's could-be-fragrence, all the could-be-Joyous givings of roses... 'course, one
> > dispenses with all the could-be-thorns, "two".
> > despite what's in the rose bush's good DNA.
>> Yes, but without the DNA steering itself, the rose bush would not even
> have tried to grow.
it's it's the energy-flow that is wdb2t that does everything that the DNA, supposedly, does.
without wdb2t, the DNA is inert.
cheers, ken (K. P. Collins)
