Frank Buckler wrote:
"All science have to make the asumtion thats its object is
deterministic. If e.g. psychology does not, it leave the scientific path
and enters religion."
Science is the study of reality. If reality is found to contain some
random component, then shouldn't the above assumption be labeled dogma
and the insistence on that assumption be 'religious'?
Will Dwinnell
predictor at compuserve.com
