Thinking without language?

[Peter T. Daniels]

Do we need any further evidence that this thread is misplaced on
sci.lang??

kenneth Collins wrote:
> 
> i've developed just two theories. the one in Neuroscience has finally
> become a 'subset' of Tapered Harmony (the one in Physics). so there's
> actually only one theory, albeit, containing a significant 'subset'.
> BTW, NDT is a 'subset' of TH =only= because TH explains stuff that
> doesn't exist, innately, within nervous systems. this's a bit arbitrary,
> however, because everything that exists within physical reality can have
> 'derived existence' within the nervous system. (my version of 'chicken &
> egg', except that what came first is known... wdb2t.)
> 
> yes, Tapered Harmony's position is, and i can demonstrate, that
> everything within physical reality 'reduces' directly to the 'one-way'
> (per Universal half-phase) flow of energy from order to disorder that is
> What's Described By 2nd Thermo (wdb2t).
> 
> there's a lot to it. nothing that requires more than 3-D, but a =lot=.
> 
> 'difficulty', inherent, stems from the quantity of stuff that's
> in-there, not 'complexity'.
> 
> there are infinite 'pointers'.
> 
> Tapered Harmony is Simple.
> 
> what makes it Simple is that the infinite 'pointers' all Point to the
> one thing, wdb2t.
> 
> 'trouble' is, i must Sleep :-)
> 
> probably won't be back online, in any significant way, until after
> Thanksgiving.
> 
> ken (K. P. Collins)
> 
> patrik bagge wrote:
> 
> > do not allow me to disturb
> >
> > wdb2t, is the basis of all your theories ken ?
> >
> > any pointers?
> >
> > /pat

-- 
Peter T. Daniels     grammatim at worldnet.att.net