Lee Sau Dan ~{@nJX6X~} wrote:
> >>>>> "Larisa" == Larisa Migachyov <lvm at leland.Stanford.EDU> writes:
>> Larisa> Well, I don't think that the notes enter into that; by
> Larisa> then, the notes and finger motions become close to
> Larisa> automatic. There are some verbal thoughts of the "Oh no!
> Larisa> I can't believe I missed that note!" variety - but in
> Larisa> order to play well, one has to feel the emotion that one
> Larisa> is playing, and let the music flow through one's mind. I
> Larisa> can't explain the kind of thinking involved - but it is
> Larisa> definitely thinking, and definitely wordless. (and not on
> Larisa> the note level).
>> I do have the "Oh no! I missed that note!" thought when playing the
> piano, but that thought comes in a completely NON-VERBAL way. Again,
> that though flashings in my mind in a language-independent way, and
> there is too little time for me to put the thought into words of any
> language I'm fluent in.
yes, Dr. Lee. as is discussed in AoK, Ap5 (in the section that discusses 'dynamic
subordinate coupling), what's happening is sensory/motor-template 'mismatch-detection,
via TD E/I-minimization. it's a higher-'level', but exactly-the-same, form of the
'startle response'.
> I don't know why you MUST tie each thought with some words. Yes, you
> need the words to describe it to us, but that doesn't means that you
> MUST use those words when you think about it. Have you ever had some
> "strange" feelings that you find it hard to describe it to your
> friends verbally? Have you ever had some bright theories which you
> find it hard to explain to your friends verbally (but pretty easy when
> you use diagrams)?
:-)
Cheers, Dr. Lee, ken
