kpaulc at earthlink.net
Thu Nov 25 05:34:49 EST 1999
i read a story, tonight. Bishop Fulton Sheen told it. it was an old Russian story
about a person in Hell who was asked by an Angel whether, if granted the means to
get out of Hell, would the person take the opportunity? the person answered,
"Yes." so the Angel came back and held out a carrot for the person to grab onto.
the person grabbed hold, but all the other people in Hell tried to grab onto the
so, all remained in Hell.
the story reflects why it is that i just do the work.
it's the 'carrot' that's the Problem.
kenneth Collins wrote:
> hi, Patrik.
> patrik bagge wrote:
> > kenneth Collins skrev i meddelandet <383BA800.47455D82 at earthlink.net>...
> > >it's just that there's so much that remains to be communicated, and my
> > >resources are so small. i can't keep saying the same stuff over and over
> > >again... gotta move-on.
> > >it's a sorrow that so few receive the whole. but what's open to me is
> > what's
> > >open to me. what's not is what's not.
> > ok, allow me to give you a little 'advice'
> > if you want acceptance, do some marketing, it's the
> > oldest trick in the book, maybe engineer a site, if
> > you already haven't, with easy going language and
> > detailed theoretical information.
> > use 'normal' channels, academic and other
> > to market your beliefs.
> > it's no fun knowing things alone.
> i've done all the 'normal' stuff ad nauseum. i've not donea web site be-cause
> it's in my experience that anything i do
> online is maliciously 'hacked', so i don't want to 'participate'
> in my work, and its presentation, being so-'controlled'.
> > of course there is a possibility that you are 'wrong'
> in the main, nope. i don't 'mess-around' with Verification.
> in small 'details', such as 'symbol'-usage, etc., it's as you say, for-sure.
> i don't get 'caught-up' in 'trivial' stuff, because all of the work i've done
> is at Foundation 'levels'.
> > , but that seems to be what science is all about,
> > seeking , accepted by others, 'truth'.
> > receiving a lot of heat in the process.
> i see Science as 'just' the drawing of one's self up to Truth. anything
> beyond that is other-than-Science.
> of course, Communication of stuff that can enhance the General Good is
> Ethically-Obligatory. i've endeavored to accomplish such, with respect to the
> work i've done, but have found that there are some, lacking Ethic, who ab-use
> what i communicate, and that shifts Ethical-Obligation with respect to such
> to me. such gets-my-attention-big-'time'. [because of what's transpired, i
> 'own' stuff that folks 'think' they 'own'. folks know this, and there's a
> huge-Ugliness in the mix that folks've, thus far, responded to with
> 'covering-up' behavior, that, in this matter, constitutes Murder on a massive
> scale. a couple of decades ago, when i saw what was going to happen, i worked
> =really-hard= to circumvent the Ethical Tragedy inherent, but to no avail.]
> as for 'marketing', i'm not 'for-sale', and neither is the work i've done. i
> just wish there was a way in which i could earn a living by doing the work.
> > The next little trick is to 'make' others do the
> > marketing and fighting for you, in this scenario
> > you become the idle bystander, watching all
> > the fuzz from 'above', enjoying your cappucino.
> the understanding must be Published in 'normal' ways, preferably, in a
> 'standard'-form text book, so that it can be made-available to everyone,
> without Prejudice.
> folks who see only 'profits' have actively 'endeavored'-against this
> outcome... they've chosen to 'moved away from' Truth, and all the Benefit
> in-it with respect to those who Suffer-Greatly.
> this's the worse-possible 'outcome'.
> K. P. Collins (ken)
More information about the Neur-sci