"swingpony" at netscape*no.spam*.net
Thu Nov 25 10:17:49 EST 1999
The carrot isn't the problem it is the people who are the problem. Point is even hell
wont change them.
kenneth Collins wrote:
> i read a story, tonight. Bishop Fulton Sheen told it. it was an old Russian story
> about a person in Hell who was asked by an Angel whether, if granted the means to
> get out of Hell, would the person take the opportunity? the person answered,
> "Yes." so the Angel came back and held out a carrot for the person to grab onto.
> the person grabbed hold, but all the other people in Hell tried to grab onto the
> so, all remained in Hell.
> the story reflects why it is that i just do the work.
> it's the 'carrot' that's the Problem.
> kenneth Collins wrote:
> > hi, Patrik.
> > patrik bagge wrote:
> > > kenneth Collins skrev i meddelandet <383BA800.47455D82 at earthlink.net>...
> > > >it's just that there's so much that remains to be communicated, and my
> > > >resources are so small. i can't keep saying the same stuff over and over
> > > >again... gotta move-on.
> > >
> > > >it's a sorrow that so few receive the whole. but what's open to me is
> > > what's
> > > >open to me. what's not is what's not.
> > >
> > > ok, allow me to give you a little 'advice'
> > > if you want acceptance, do some marketing, it's the
> > > oldest trick in the book, maybe engineer a site, if
> > > you already haven't, with easy going language and
> > > detailed theoretical information.
> > > use 'normal' channels, academic and other
> > > to market your beliefs.
> > > it's no fun knowing things alone.
> > i've done all the 'normal' stuff ad nauseum. i've not donea web site be-cause
> > it's in my experience that anything i do
> > online is maliciously 'hacked', so i don't want to 'participate'
> > in my work, and its presentation, being so-'controlled'.
> > > of course there is a possibility that you are 'wrong'
> > in the main, nope. i don't 'mess-around' with Verification.
> > in small 'details', such as 'symbol'-usage, etc., it's as you say, for-sure.
> > i don't get 'caught-up' in 'trivial' stuff, because all of the work i've done
> > is at Foundation 'levels'.
> > > , but that seems to be what science is all about,
> > > seeking , accepted by others, 'truth'.
> > > receiving a lot of heat in the process.
> > i see Science as 'just' the drawing of one's self up to Truth. anything
> > beyond that is other-than-Science.
> > of course, Communication of stuff that can enhance the General Good is
> > Ethically-Obligatory. i've endeavored to accomplish such, with respect to the
> > work i've done, but have found that there are some, lacking Ethic, who ab-use
> > what i communicate, and that shifts Ethical-Obligation with respect to such
> > to me. such gets-my-attention-big-'time'. [because of what's transpired, i
> > 'own' stuff that folks 'think' they 'own'. folks know this, and there's a
> > huge-Ugliness in the mix that folks've, thus far, responded to with
> > 'covering-up' behavior, that, in this matter, constitutes Murder on a massive
> > scale. a couple of decades ago, when i saw what was going to happen, i worked
> > =really-hard= to circumvent the Ethical Tragedy inherent, but to no avail.]
> > as for 'marketing', i'm not 'for-sale', and neither is the work i've done. i
> > just wish there was a way in which i could earn a living by doing the work.
> > > The next little trick is to 'make' others do the
> > > marketing and fighting for you, in this scenario
> > > you become the idle bystander, watching all
> > > the fuzz from 'above', enjoying your cappucino.
> > the understanding must be Published in 'normal' ways, preferably, in a
> > 'standard'-form text book, so that it can be made-available to everyone,
> > without Prejudice.
> > folks who see only 'profits' have actively 'endeavored'-against this
> > outcome... they've chosen to 'moved away from' Truth, and all the Benefit
> > in-it with respect to those who Suffer-Greatly.
> > this's the worse-possible 'outcome'.
> > K. P. Collins (ken)
More information about the Neur-sci