Thinking without language?

Lee Sau Dan ~{ at nJX6X~} sdlee at
Sun Nov 28 22:33:36 EST 1999

>>>>> "John" == John Turnbull <john at> writes:

    John> Pronunciation is irrelevant, as is the fact that it is
    John> called arrow.  It is a common symbol that has an agreed upon
    John> meaning, that is used as part of a greater whole to
    John> communicate.

So, that's a  symbol not related to sounds?  How  then would your lips
move "microscopically", according to your great theory, when you think
of it?

Lee Sau Dan                     $(0,X)wAV(B(Big5)                    ~{@nJX6X~}(HZ) 
|                      e-mail: sdlee at |

More information about the Neur-sci mailing list