In article <81pden$h80$1 at pyrite.mv.net>, Bill Todd <billtodd at foo.mv.com> wrote:
>Mea culpa (see previous amending post) to the several people who responded.
>I'm still less than convinced that 'non-deterministic' and 'random' are
>synonymous, since the word to me implies a degree of unpredictability beyond
>mere uncertainty - e.g., a truly 'random' event to me is one whose
>probability cannot be evaluated.
You may be getting the hackish usage of "random" to mean "capricious and
arbitrary". e.g., a person who is likely to become angry when corrected would
be "random", and you, by contrast, aren't. This is a different word, although
it derives from the more technical one.
>If this is indeed *not* the accepted
>mathematical definition, then so be it (and thank you for so informing me).
Mathematicians don't always agree; many terms have different meanings
depending on the field you're in. Still, I'm pretty sure "random" is very
similar to "non-deterministic".
Copyright 1999, All rights reserved. Peter Seebach / seebs at plethora.net
C/Unix wizard, Pro-commerce radical, Spam fighter. Boycott Spamazon!
Will work for interesting hardware. http://www.plethora.net/~seebs/
Visit my new ISP <URL:http://www.plethora.net/> --- More Net, Less Spam!