Massive depth of field

gary gaugler see.signature at bottom.com
Tue Oct 26 16:37:12 EST 1999


On Tue, 26 Oct 1999 15:56:34 +0100, "Syncroscopy" <nospam at nospam.com>
wrote:

>> If you do this any where near real time it takes a lot of computer
>> power. If you have to align them as well it gets real hairy real fast.
>>
>> Just finding the infocus pixels on a high resolution image takes a lot
>> of processing power. Then having to deal with it in a visual
>> environment is a headache.
>>
>> Nothing magic just real hard work.
>>
>Have a look at Montage Explorer,
>http://www.syncroscopy.com/syncroscopy/montex.asp
>Using the normal microscope controls you can wander around the sample under
>investigation at high magnification building up a composite in-focus picture
>in real time, with image sizes up 6k x 6k pixels. This involves locating the
>in-focus components and image alignment and is done in real time on a 500Mhz
>Pentium III PC !!!
>
>

I take multiple shots manually focused and saved to disk using a Sony
DKC-5000.  analySIS is fast.  I am using a P-III/550 with 384MB RAM
and 30G hard drive.


Gary Gaugler, Ph.D.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Modern surfers use PC boards....you can too at

    http://photoweb.net

 E-mail: gary at gaugler dot com



More information about the Neur-sci mailing list