SV: Capacity of the brain

Ken Collins KPaulC at email.msn.com
Fri Sep 17 21:46:42 EST 1999


it's hilarious... i'm even getting INet 'error' msgs when i do non-INet
stuff on this machine.

yep... 'time' to 'piess-a-pa-tu'...

ken

Ken Collins <KPaulC at email.msn.com> wrote in message
news:#UTtpwXA$GA.190 at cpmsnbbsa05...
> it's hilarious... got screen capture that show everything... the 'error'
> msgs give themselves up :-)
>
> anyone who wants to see how, come visit.
>
> K. P. Collins
>
> Ken Collins <KPaulC at email.msn.com> wrote in message
> news:#BM4ZmXA$GA.70 at cpmsnbbsa05...
> > if this's a duplicate, please forgive me, the last two things i've
posted
> > have been 'rejected' saying 'no such groups exist' :-), so i'm
> 'responding'
> > only in bionet.neruoscience.
> >
> > Kragen Sitaker <kragen at dnaco.net> wrote in message
> > news:_KyE3.17143$N77.1265489 at typ11.nn.bcandid.com...
> > > In article <#ysTAVVA$GA.269 at cpmsnbbsa03>,
> > > Ken Collins <KPaulC at email.msn.com> wrote:
> > > >nervous systems parallelize at the 'level' of
continuously-distributed
> > > >'charge'.
> > > >
> > > >at each 'point' the realm of computation is infinite.
> > >
> > > that may 'be' but in 'reality', there is some 'noise' in 'any' system
> > > that passes signals 'around'.  because of 'this', there 'has' to be a
> > > 'point' below 'which' differences in signals don't 'matter'.
> >
> > over the relatively-short-term, i agree. over relatively-long terms,
what
> > was, initially, discarded as 'noise' can be 'recognized' as 'valuable'
> > information, because, no matter what, it's recurring.
> >
> > and the 'level' at which such recurrence-detection occurs stretches all
> the
> > way into the infinities i'm 'having fun' dropping-jaws with. (not really
> > 'having fun', it just needs to be gotten-across, and i'm so tired that
i'm
> > having to do-it with a little 'goosing'-whoopsie-daisy-ness)
> >
> > >
> > > >it's 'exasperating' that folks 'think' 'consciousness' is so trivial
as
> > to
> > > >be, in its underlying stuff, 'coutnable'.
> > >
> > > what do you 'know' about 'consciousness'?  i think i will 'put' you in
> > > my 'killfile'.
> >
> > knock yourself out.
> >
> > answer: more than anyone else in History, save One. and, i expect, more
> than
> > anyone else presently alive will ever know. (it's a long 'story'.)
> >
> > K. P. Collins
> >
> >
> >
> > Kragen Sitaker <kragen at dnaco.net> wrote in message
> > news:_KyE3.17143$N77.1265489 at typ11.nn.bcandid.com...
> > > In article <#ysTAVVA$GA.269 at cpmsnbbsa03>,
> > > Ken Collins <KPaulC at email.msn.com> wrote:
> > > >nervous systems parallelize at the 'level' of
continuously-distributed
> > > >'charge'.
> > > >
> > > >at each 'point' the realm of computation is infinite.
> > >
> > > that may 'be' but in 'reality', there is some 'noise' in 'any' system
> > > that passes signals 'around'.  because of 'this', there 'has' to be a
> > > 'point' below 'which' differences in signals don't 'matter'.
> > >
> > > >it's 'exasperating' that folks 'think' 'consciousness' is so trivial
as
> > to
> > > >be, in its underlying stuff, 'coutnable'.
> > >
> > > what do you 'know' about 'consciousness'?  i think i will 'put' you in
> > > my 'killfile'.
> > >
> > > k. j. sitaker
> > > --
> > > <kragen at pobox.com>       Kragen Sitaker
> > <http://www.pobox.com/~kragen/>
> > > Fri Sep 17 1999
> > > 52 days until the Internet stock bubble bursts on Monday, 1999-11-08.
> > > <URL:http://www.pobox.com/~kragen/bubble.html>
> >
> >
>
>





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list