Scientists 'locate' intelligence
bora99 at earthlink.net
Mon Aug 7 22:47:28 EST 2000
Sergio, certainly our brain functions are not concentrated on a particular
cortical region; however, it would be dull to totally rule out what the
poster tells. It is a known fact that the complex motor control and sensory
array of human brain is distributed in diffirent cortical regions. The blood
on these areas must be very irregular for the different interpretations.
it is still very uncertain how thinking/intelligence occurs in the brain. It
optimisticly very intuitive if such an area has been discovered and further
researched. Intelligence could be originated from one region after gathering
information from sub-cortical regions.
Sub-cortical regions may be solving most of the routine tasks locally
and do not even send tham to the upper levels of topology. It would be
a traingle shape topology.Such a topology is possible and could
have been formed as a result of evolution. Evolution may be merciless, but
it has choosen efficiency over complexity in most cases. A distributed
intelligence may be what we have, but topological would be more of
an evolutinary path because it is not complex. Please do not compare
human brain with today's technological replicas.
On the other hand, it is my opion that this research has been probably
conducted millions of times. I am not a neuroscientist but it sounds very
obvious to conduct such an illistrative research on brain's blood flow
sampling. If it hasnt been done before, I am very disappointed.
note: I do not claim that what I am saying above is the result of a
research. Please let me know your opinions to further discuss this
"Sergio Navega" <snavega at attglobal.net> wrote in message
news:39885cd9_4 at news3.prserv.net...
> MS wrote in message ...
> >It sounds like a premature generalization to say that because several
> >activated one area that it validates a g-factor of intelligence. Given
> >role of working memory across complex tasks and the importance of
> >dorsolateral PFC in working memory, couldn't a working memory impairment
> >account for those findings?
> I agree. Although I'm sympathetic to the concept of general intelligence,
> I don't think we have a specific area of the brain responsible for
> it. I think it is premature and somewhat "sensationalistic" to claim
> to have found such an area. One of the things we should have in mind
> when thinking about brains is that few things are really "concentrated".
> Evolution is merciless with everything that is too specific, and
> human brains evolved exactly to be adaptive and generic. Plasticity
> is the rule.
> Sergio Navega.
More information about the Neur-sci