the network date-'time' stamp of the msg quoted below was set
inaccurately.
K. P. Collins
kenneth Collins wrote:
>> the dynamics that're transpiring are so Sorrow-filled.
>> 'knees-jerking' all over the place.
>> kenneth Collins wrote:
>> >[...]
>> > there's no 'mystery' here. it's all an interaction of body-orientation
> > =mechanics= with neural-activation dynamics. where the energy-flow that
> > is what's been referred to as 'gravity' comes into play is via the
> > stereotypically-repetitive =mechanics= that 'gravity' imposes on bodily
> > motion, including orientation.
> >
> > when one walks, for instance, one's arms 'hover' around the position
> > that's least energy consuming with respect to 'gravity', so the
> > correlated neural trophic dynamics 'hover' around the correlated
> > least-action (TD E/I-minimized) 'state.
> >
> > the same occurs in-utero be-cause 'gravity' always acts toward the
> > center of Earth, so even though a fetus has 'freedom' to to orient
> > within the birth fluid, the early effector activations are all subjected
> > to "gravity'" single force vector. this means that, despite fetal
> > orientation in the womb,
>> =given= the "special topological homeomorphism" of the nervous system
> (AoK, 'short paper')
>> >effector activations that oppose 'gravity' will
> > be qualitatively-'opposite' effector activations that 'go-with'
> > 'gravity'.
>> within the "special topological homeomorphism" of the nervous system.
>> > such yields the same 'centering' dynamics that were discussed
> > previously, and precipitate the same 'hovering' of neural activation
> > 'states' that result in the development of 'cortical columnar'
> > structure.
>> everything was Verified decades ago.
>> it's sorrowfully-'hilarious'.
>> 'no one' will receive a presentation because 'everyone' prefers the old
> Ignorance to Truth.
>> when a developing fetus is 'free' to orient in the womb this way and
> that, how can there be anything that's the 'opposite' of anything else
> with respect to 'gravity'?
>> be-cause of the "special topological homeomorphism" of the nervous
> system, which has been described in AoK all along.
>> is there any small group of folks who do not 'Love' Ignorance more than
> they Love Understanding?
>> what's so heart-breaking is when i see 'celebrations' of Ignorance such
> as occurred this day.
>> 'everyone' thinks i'm 'out to get' them, when all i'm doing is lifting
> folks up out of the Ignorance that's Ravaged Humanity since the
> beginning.
>> i'll continue, even in the face of such 'blood-thirsty celebrations'
> which 'blindly' Worship that which maintains their 'blindness'.
>> i mean no 'offense'. i'm just trying to 'put a face' on Abstract
> Ignorance, the absence of understanding of how nervous systems
> process-information via 'blindly'-automated TD E/I-minimization in
> nervous systems which, nevertheless, process-information via
> 'blind'-automation.
>> it hurts like Hell to be the one who must stand 'on the other side of'
> folks' affective-Inversion with respect to the understanding.
>> it's a 'place' of continuous 'Scourging'.
>> and the one who 'stands there', so stands as a 'bloody' mess, with folks
> finding only 'great amusement' in their affectively-Inverted view.
>> this is, BTW, the 'same' thing that happened to Jesus. [=DO NOT= Ab-Use
> my saying this, which i =must= say in order to give folks what's
> necessary to understand both what happened to Jesus, and how Great was
> Jesus' Love for Humanity. =DO NOT= Ab-Use my saying this. 'Attack me.
> but =DO NOT= Attack Jesus because, since the opportunity to give insight
> to the dynamics has arisen, i've Chosen to 'lift the veil' from the
> dynamics that underpinned His Crucifixion. it wasn't 'the Jews' who
> Crucified Jesus. it was the same "Beast", Abstract Ignorance, that
> leaves me a 'bloody-mess' because i, too, Love you. Think about it.]
>> K. P. Collins
