kenneth Collins wrote:
> except for posting the diagrams, i did everything you cite (quoted below) in 1975-6.
>> if you've been monitoring the discussions, and if you've the understanding you claim, you must
> know that i've also done everything you cite (quoted below), except post the diagrams, right
> here in B.N, along with repeatedly offering to present everything in-person.
'course, i invented the Maths i use, as necessary, and i don't 'bother' with symbolic notation
because i understand what i'm doing.
but i've discussed everything in kenning-ed 'plain English', and have, in long former msgs in
another online Science 'place' asked for help with respect to 'translating' the Maths into a
traditional, symbolic, format (to no avail).
so, i offer to go in-person to present everything diagrammatically, which is actually the best way
to communicate anything, as far as i'm concerned.
in my posts, i try to 'paint pictures' using verbal symbolization... because it's most-universal.
so the stuff has been presented in AoK, and in prior posts, over and over again.
the main difference between 'traditional' stuff and NDT & TH is that NDT & TH work, and are
exceedingly-easy to move-forward in, because once the 'special topological homeomorphism' is
grasped, the rest to the symbolism involved is flat-out 'natural'.
k. p. collins
