Scientists 'locate' intelligence
skaggs at bns.pitt.edu
Tue Jul 25 10:40:29 EST 2000
"Mark D. Morin" <mdmpsyd at PETERHOOD69.rcn.com> writes:
> The concept of "intelligence" is pretty much of a nonsequetor in individuals with
> brain damage. Because measuring intelligence presumes an intact brain. Also
> note that the current psychometric concept of intelligence is not unitary but
> consists of any number of measures that go into the overall, composit, IQ.
> For example, someone with frontal lobe or frontal network damage is going to have
> word finding problems. That is going to pull down their score on vocabulary. If
> it's right frontal, they are likely to have lower scores on picture arrangement
> and block design. Left or right, they are likely to have difficulties with tasks
> assessing abstract reasoning.
Well, if the authors of the Science paper are correct in their speculation,
then a patient with bilateral damage to the small lateral frontal region
they describe would be impaired on *any* test that weighs significantly
on the mystical "g" factor, and, as I understand it, this includes
every measure that goes into the composite IQ score. To put it
colloquially, such patients should look like they just aren't very
smart in general.
More information about the Neur-sci