evolutionary significance of emotions !!
lvm at Stanford.EDU
Fri Mar 3 02:46:45 EST 2000
Nick Medford wrote:
> In article <89mutv$edj$1 at nntp.Stanford.EDU>, Larisa Migachyov
> <lvm at Stanford.EDU> writes
> >sisial wrote:
> >> (Estimates for lifetime risk of developing severe depression is, I believe,
> >> around 8% in females and 0.3% in males.
> >This sentence caught my eye,
> Good thing too- it didn't catch mine and I let it go unchallenged.
> > and I apologize for deviating completely from
> >the topic. Has anyone investigated why the risk of depression in women is
> >25 times greater than that in men?
> No, because it isn't. Lifetime prevalence for depression is generally quoted at
> 2.5 - 4.5% for men and 5 - 9% (i.e. roughly twice as high) for women. Peak
> age of onset is in the 30s for women and in the 40s for men.
> One factor that contributes to the increased prevalence in women is the
> relatively common phenomenon of post-natal depression. One could
> certainly argue that cultural and social factors may play a role too.
Ah, that makes a bit more sense. I was reading some kind of fluff the
other day that correlates marriage with depression in women; are there any
solid statistical studies that support that, or is it just fluff?
Want to hire an engineer? Check out my resume at
More information about the Neur-sci