"Near Proof for Near-Death?"

Ian Goddard igoddard at erols.mom
Mon Dec 17 15:43:59 EST 2001


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A52232-2001Dec16.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/health/newsid_1685000/1685311.stm

http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991693


"NO MEDICAL EXPLANATION" FOR NEAR DEATH EXPERIENCES
By Emma Young
New Scientist
Friday, December 14, 2001
 
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991693
 
Medical explanations cannot account for near death experiences (NDEs),
according to the results of the biggest prospective study to date of
patients who were resuscitated after clinical death. However, patients
who reported an NDE were more likely to die soon afterwards.
 
Pim Van Lommel and his team at Hospital Rijnstate in the Netherlands
interviewed 344 patients who were resuscitated after heart failure at
10 hospitals across the country. The patients were questioned as soon
as they were well enough.
 
Eighteen per cent reported an NDE - classed as a memory of "a special
state of consciousness, including specific elements such as
out-of-body experience, pleasant feelings and seeing a tunnel."
 
But the team found no link between NDEs and drugs used to treat the
patients, the duration of cardiac arrest or unconsciousness, or the
patients' reports of the degree to which they feared death before the
incident.
 
"This was the surprising thing," van Lommel says. "It's always said
that NDEs are just a phenomenon relating to the dying brain and the
lack of oxygen to the brain cells. But that's not true. If there was 
a physiological cause, all the patients should have had an NDE."
 
Letting go
 
The patients were mostly elderly, with an average age of 62. Van
Lommel found that those that reported an NDE were significantly more
likely to die within 30 days.
 
"There is the idea that people can decide to some extent when they
die," says van Lommel. "Perhaps when they had an NDE, their fear of
death was over and they could let go."
 
The team did find that patients who were under 60 and female were 
more likely to report an NDE. But the causes of the experience 
remain a mystery, van Lommel says.
 
His team questioned surviving NDE patients again two years after their
resuscitation, and then after eight years. Most of the patients
recalled the event in striking detail. And most showed significant
psychological changes, the team reports. The 23 NDE patients who were
still alive eight years later "had become more emotionally vulnerable
and empathic", they write.
 
Pushing the limit
 
Van Lommel's team report anecdotal stories of patients recalling
events that happened around them during out of body experiences while
they were clinically dead. These experiences "push at the limit of
medical ideas about the range of human consciousness and the
mind/brain relationship," Van Lommel says.
 
Christopher French, at the Anomalistic Psychology Research Unit at
Goldsmiths College, London, says the team's paper is "intriguing",
though he notes that van Lommel's team failed to contact the patients
for corroboration. He points out that NDEs are impossible to
objectively verify - and that out of body experiences have not been
proved to exist.
 
But, in a commentary on the research, he writes: "the out of body
component of the NDE offers probably the best hope of launching any
kind of attack on current concepts of the relationship between
consciousness and brain function."
 
If researchers could prove that clinically dead patients, with no
electrical activity in their cortex, can be aware of events around
them and form memories, this would suggest that the brain does not
generate consciousness, French and Van Lommel think.

****

http://IanGoddard.net


   




More information about the Neur-sci mailing list