Why Be Awake? (Re: A Theory of Sleep)

Filip van den Bergh F.S.vandenBergh at students.fss.uu.nl
Tue Oct 9 05:06:15 EST 2001

Liar42 <liar42 at aol.com> wrote in message
news:20011007221135.21665.00000622 at mb-bj.aol.com...
> >
> >So i think the waking state, rather than sleep, should be regarded as
> >the "default" state.
> >
> >y.k.y
> I do not regard it so.

This isn't happening! Not only have you managed to write a short post, I
actually agree with you! Why don't you regard the waking state as default?


More information about the Neur-sci mailing list