brain sizes: Einstein's and women's
lojbab at lojban.org
Mon Aug 26 20:31:40 EST 2002
"John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
>> Living by Mr. August's version of Christian principles would be like
>> living in a monastery. We have the choice not to do so.
>READ: you INSIST on your "right to commit adultery", and being prohibited
>from doing so "would be like living in a monastery".
That is not what I said, and I refuse to allow you to twist my words
by your phony "readings". I mean what >I< say, not what YOU say.
You understand nothing, including the English language. This is
because you are an alien nincompoop.
>Most Americans, even most women, think you feminazis and "liberals" are the
>most disgusting creatures walking the Earth.
Coming from you, that is a compliment. We would LOVE to disgust you
so much that you LEAVE.
>Now, it could be the jews, or the government itself, but the likelihood that
>it's the moron "liberals" on this forum are zero unless they have access to
>all internet addresses.
Everyone has access to all Internet addresses.
>> >Children use this computer when naked women pop up all over the place.
>> You have children using your computer? Then they are exposed to YOUR
>> filth, which is worse than any naked woman.
>The feeling is mutual. The last person in the world whom my children should
>be exposed to are you feminazis and "liberals".
A shame that they are growing up in a world in which YOU are the
>> Really? I've never met her myself. My kids would love to. I haven't
>> even seen her picture for at least a week or two (I haven't kept
>This would be considered child abuse in most parts of the world,
Show me one law that says that my seeing a picture of Britney, or my
children wanting to meet her, is "child abuse".
You love to lie, don't you, loser.
>> >The nigger music is the vilest, most degenerate form of pornography
>> Pornography seems to be in the mind of the beholder. If you don't
>> like it, don't listen to it.
>> >But mention the Holy Bible, and 20 million jews and niggers and feminazis
>> >and other muds and "liberals" all of a sudden "feel insulted".
>> I am more insulted by your presence on the nets than I am by a mention
>> of the Holy Bible.
>> I am insulted by your sloppy research, and by claims that you pull out
>> of your strange orifice, which are so easily disproved.
>You've never "disproved" a single statement or stat.
I have disproved most of what you write, leaving it nothing more than
your unsupported nincompoop opinion.
>> I've never seen a kid charged with a crime for carrying a Bible in
>> their school bag.
>It's in the news, regularly. It's all over the internet.
Show me one. Loser.
>> If a member of the male sex wishes that, they can go join Richard in
>> his monastery. That is what monasteries are designed for - to lock
>> men away from the sinful world.
>It's also what government's are for,
Not since the Taliban was booted.
>> We don't care what he feels his responsibilities are. We are human
>> beings with our own rights, and do not need every Christian thinking
>> that they need to be our parents.
>ahh, here it is! Finally, an admission that you're a jew!
I don't see the word "Jew" in that paragraph at all. Have you had
your eyes checked?
>To all jews, upholding Christian principles is tantamount to parental
I don't know. Ask all Jews.
>What you want is license, not the rule of law. You want license to do what
>you "feel" is right while denying men like Richard the ability to even live
>as a Christian in his own Christian nation.
I am not denying his right to live as a Christian. But if he wants a
Christian nation, he needs to go to a country with that religion
established. England, Ireland, and Vatican City qualify.
>You *insist* on your "right to commit adultery", just as the slut Betty
>Friedan and all her minions insist on.
I do? Where?
>> He does not. This Christian is not behind him. The multitude of
>> Christians in Europe who have fewer taboos on sexual display are
>> obviously not behind him.
>You're confusing pornography (or "sexual display") with NON-sexual dress
>customs. The French don't consider the display of the woman's breast on the
>beaches of Monaco to be "sexual display",
But I'll bet that Richard August does.
>You "know" even less about what Christians know than you "know" about
>physics (which is less than zero).
I have a degree in the subject. You probably don't have a degree in
>> >Many countries have succeeded in banning American nigger music and
>> Which ones are these?
>China, Russia, France, India, Korea, Vietnam, Japan, and even some African
>countries, have had the brains to refuse to let "American" jewish
>pornography into their coutries.
>There have been some lapses in some areas,
In other words, you can't prove it, but will call the exceptions
>> >And those are the countries which don't have the tremendous
>> >social problems we have.
>> If they exist, they don't have our freedoms either. In most of them,
>> you would not be able to post your BS on the net. You are free to
>> move to any of them if you choose. We won't miss you.
>There's a huge difference between "freedom" and "license".
I have not demanded anything. We have freedom, and do not need to
>You're not demanding "freedom"--you're demanding "license".
I don't, but the words mean the same thing.
>Main Entry: 1li·cense
>Variant(s): or li·cence /'lI-s&n(t)s/
>Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French licence, from Latin licentia, from licent-, licens, present participle of licEre to be permitted
>Date: 14th century
>1 a : permission to act b : freedom of action
>3 a : freedom that allows or is used with irresponsibility b : disregard for standards of personal conduct : LICENTIOUSNESS
Funny, I see the word "freedom" in that definition.
>You want only the "right to commit adultery" with no personal consequences,
No, I don't, as a matter of fact. In fact I cannot imagine that
adultery COULD have "no personal consequences".
>and 84-90% of Americans DISAGREE with you.
Number pulled from strange orifice.
>Which poll do you think is the most accurate:
>1) Our own poll, which shows 84% want adultery laws to be upheld, or
You mean the ones that don't exist in many states, including
>2) The Gallup Poll which shows that 90% believe adultery is "always wrong"
>or "almost always wrong"?
Gallup is almost certainly more accurate than nincompoop.
>Either way, your demand for "license" is not just amoral--it's illegal, and
1. It is not my demand.
2. I know that freedom is inherently amoral, or it is not "freedom".
3. It is NOT illegal.
4. Those who practice it (and I am NOT one) don't much care whether
it is unpopular.
>This Christian nation
Which one? The U.S. is not one.
>Your fellow parasitic minority of jews, niggers, feminazis, faggots, and
>other "liberals" need to go, just as the Holy Bible demands. Altogether,
>you're less than 15% of the population,
Blacks alone are 13% of the population, expected to rise to 15% by
2050 (Table 14, Statistical Abstract). Gore, supported by what you
call "liberals", got a majority of the popular vote in the last
More information about the Neur-sci