BLASPHEMY: brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

[John Knight]

"Cary Kittrell" <cary at afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:asiusu$kl9$1 at oasis.ccit.arizona.edu...
> In article <jPdF9.15911$kz4.758688 at news2.west.cox.net> "John Knight"
<jwknight at polbox.com> writes:
> <
> <"Cary Kittrell" <cary at afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
> <news:as36rr$qbk$1 at oasis.ccit.arizona.edu...
> <> In article <ZO8F9.14872$kz4.670363 at news2.west.cox.net> "John Knight"
> <<jwknight at polbox.com> writes:
> <>     Today, almost half a century after the publication of the
Encyclical,
> <>     new knowledge has led to the recognition in the theory of evolution
of
> <>     more than a hypothesis. It is indeed remarkable that this theory
has
> <>     been progressively accepted by researchers, following a series of
> <>     discoveries in various fields of knowledge. The convergence,
neither
> <>     sought nor fabricated, of the results of work that was conducted
> <>     independently is in itself a significant argument in favor of this
> <>     theory.
> <>
> <
> <Which is just part of the reason that the Catholic Church is losing its
> <grip, why so many people suspect the Pope of being a jew, why they
question
> <why the Catholic Church should have "apologized" to the JEWS for this
> <mythical "6 million dead jews in a holocaust" while ignoring the role
jews
> <played in KILLING 50-160 million CHRISTIANS in WWII.
> <
> <Either that, or they are just as STUPID as you "liberals" when it comes
to
> <separating "evolution" from "creation".
> <
>
>
> <The Holy Bible is inerrant.
>
>
> Goodness.
>
>     1)  who told you that?
>
>     2)  why in the world did you believe them?
>
>     3)  no, in fact I'm quite serious.
>
>
>
> -- cary
>
>

Do your own research for a change, cary.

If you can't do this simple thing, you're beyond hope.

Though we knew that already, didn't we?

John Knight