"Cary Kittrell" <cary at afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:asiusu$kl9$1 at oasis.ccit.arizona.edu...
> In article <jPdF9.15911$kz4.758688 at news2.west.cox.net> "John Knight"
<jwknight at polbox.com> writes:
> <"Cary Kittrell" <cary at afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
> <news:as36rr$qbk$1 at oasis.ccit.arizona.edu...> <> In article <ZO8F9.14872$kz4.670363 at news2.west.cox.net> "John Knight"
> <<jwknight at polbox.com> writes:
> <> Today, almost half a century after the publication of the
> <> new knowledge has led to the recognition in the theory of evolution
> <> more than a hypothesis. It is indeed remarkable that this theory
> <> been progressively accepted by researchers, following a series of
> <> discoveries in various fields of knowledge. The convergence,
> <> sought nor fabricated, of the results of work that was conducted
> <> independently is in itself a significant argument in favor of this
> <> theory.
> <Which is just part of the reason that the Catholic Church is losing its
> <grip, why so many people suspect the Pope of being a jew, why they
> <why the Catholic Church should have "apologized" to the JEWS for this
> <mythical "6 million dead jews in a holocaust" while ignoring the role
> <played in KILLING 50-160 million CHRISTIANS in WWII.
> <Either that, or they are just as STUPID as you "liberals" when it comes
> <separating "evolution" from "creation".
>>> <The Holy Bible is inerrant.
>> 1) who told you that?
>> 2) why in the world did you believe them?
>> 3) no, in fact I'm quite serious.
>>>> -- cary
Do your own research for a change, cary.
If you can't do this simple thing, you're beyond hope.
Though we knew that already, didn't we?