"John Knight" <jwknight at polbox.com> wrote:
>If you do a little simple math, you'll see that in order for speciation to
>have occurred, there would have had to have been FAR MORE [like millions of
>times more] fossils of the "intermediate species" than of the original
>If speciation is as slow and gradual a process as the
>9% of Americans who proclaim their STUPIDITY by promoting "evolution" claim
>it is, then there would have had to have been BILLIONS of times more fossils
>of these "intermediate species" than of the original species.
There are no "intermediate species"
>You have not ONE fossil of even ONE species which can be linked to each
>other to prove that ANY kind of "speciation" or even "adaptation" ever
Yes we do.
>You also have SCIENTIFIC DNA *proof* that the "scientists" who once
>proclaimed that Neanderthal and homo sapiens were "genetically linked" were
>DEAD WRONG [read: they were NOT "scientists"].
Nonsense. It is the nature of scientific progress to prove things
wrong. Meanwhile neanderthal and humans ARE genetically linked, but
it is not the relationship that was thought.
>Neanderthal was their last great white hope