Mindforth

Jerry Avins jya at ieee.org
Thu Dec 12 17:44:24 EST 2002


"Richard S. Norman" wrote:
> 
  ...
> >
> If you are trying to make an evolutionary argument, fish are certainly
> relevant.  The human eye is the primate eye is the mammalian eye is
> the tetrapod eye is the vertebrate eye.  There are all the same basic
> design.  It was the fish who built it backwards!  (Well, not modern
> fish, but aquatic chordates nonetheless.)

Absolutely!
> 
> The cephalopod eye is simply an example of a complex, camera eye
> that is build "properly", with the light first striking the receptor
> cells.  It is used to demonstrate that, if there are two ways to do
> something, nature will try both regarless of which is supposedly
> "superior".

I think that's too glib. I assume that there is at least one possible
alternative which has never been realized.

Jerry
-- 
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯



More information about the Neur-sci mailing list