brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

[Mark D. Morin]

John Knight wrote:
> "Mark D. Morin" <mdmpsyd at NOSPAMgwi.net> wrote in message
> news:3D2BA0AB.8080603 at NOSPAMgwi.net...
> 
>>John Knight wrote:
>>
>>>"Mark D. Morin" <mdmpsyd at NOSPAMgwi.net> wrote in message
>>>news:3D2AB9D5.4090207 at NOSPAMgwi.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Tom Breton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Mark D. Morin" <mdmpsyd at PETERHOOD69gwi.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>>>How?  Point me to one peer reviewed article that makes this challenge.
>>>>>>Are you even familiar enough with the tests to make this idiotic
>>>>>>statement? What specific items are biased?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Now, be fair.  You know there are severe political and ideological
>>>>>pressures against publishing anything like that.
>>>>
>>>>No, I don't know that.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>hmmm, even the left wing "news" is full of reports of such bias, so it
>>>shouldn't take long for you to locate it if you look.  If you can't find
>>
> it,
> 
>>>let me know and I'll give you a ton of leads.
>>
>>The leads you've already provided don't appear particularly sound.
>>
>>When I say "no," I mean I've seen the studies published.  Ergo, there
>>can't be that great of a prohibition.
>>
> 
> 
> Not quite sure what you meant here, 

what i mean is that you assert a conspiracy to keep research from being 
published. it gets published, where's the conspiracy?

> but let's put this a different way.  Two
> thirds of those students who score over 550 in SAT Math are boys, but girls
> are two thirds of college admissions now.
> 
> Do you really think there's no bias involved here?

is there any claim that those admissions are being based on GRE, SAT, or 
IQ scores?


-- 
====================================================
You can't make someone love you, but you can let
yourself be loved by someone.

http://home.gwi.net/~mdmpsyd/index.htm