brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

Tom Breton tehom at REMOVEpanNOSPAMix.com
Mon Jul 15 16:35:07 EST 2002


Bob LeChevalier <lojbab at lojban.org> writes:

> "John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote:
> 
> >The simple fact that they have to go back a century and dredge up a woman
> >who got a Nobel Prize BECAUSE her husband requested she be added to the list
> >is proof enough of the lack of women Nobel Prize winners, eh?
> 
> http://www.almaz.com/nobel/women.html
> 
> lists 30 women who won Nobel prizes, many of them in the sciences, 

I checked it out, and I wouldn't have characterized the list that way.

Few of them were in the sciences (11 counting Marie Curie and her
daughter 3 times), 

Almost all the women's science prizes were shared (always with men),

Both the unshared women's science prizes suggest lowered standards:
"for the development of radioimmunoassays of peptide hormones.", "for
her determinations by X-ray techniques of the structures of important
biochemical substances."  Both seem to consist of applying existing
techniques (radioimmunoassays, X-ray techniques) to fresh data.  Good
work, and I don't criticize it, but a man wouldn't get a Nobel for it,
I think.

-- 
Tom Breton at panix.com, username tehom.  http://www.panix.com/~tehom



More information about the Neur-sci mailing list