brain sizes: Einstein's and women's
tehom at REMOVEpanNOSPAMix.com
Tue Jul 16 14:48:13 EST 2002
"Parse Tree" <parsetree at hotmail.com> writes:
> "John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
> news:KtOY8.65402$P%6.4406381 at news2.west.cox.net...
> > Every tale they tell about Hopper is larger than the one before. In
> > searching the net, there are all kinds of ridiculous claims about
> > Hopper--she "invented" the Mark I computer, she "invented" Cobol, she
> > the phrase "computer bug", she "invented" compilers.
> > What this shows us is that the very BEST woman "inventor" they could come
> > was a fraud.
> > What does that say about the rest?
> Even if you were correct here (which you are not, as has been demonstrated
> in other messages), this doesn't say anything about the rest. To believe
> that it does is a logical fallacy.
No, to believe that it *neccessarily* does is a logical fallacy. To
believe that it suggests so is common sense. That's the thing about
the real world - nothing can be proved rigorously, not really. When
you get down to it, everything is a generalization. But that doesn't
keep us from understanding the world pretty well with evidence and a
moderate level of generalization.
Tom Breton at panix.com, username tehom. http://www.panix.com/~tehom
More information about the Neur-sci