brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

Bob LeChevalier lojbab at lojban.org
Fri Jul 19 00:28:25 EST 2002


JDay123 at BellSouth.com (Jd) wrote:
>Quit fooling around with Satan.

Satan is not relevant to this discussion, except in your mind.

>Adam, being the head of household,

Non-biblical.  There is no indication that there was a "household", much less
a "head" thereof.  In the Garden of Eden, before eating the apple, there was
no need for either households or heads thereof.

>At any rate, it's not "sexist" to  uphold the biblical model of
>authority as it should exist in a familial context.

Oh, it most certainly IS sexist.  Whether it is "right" or "wrong" may be a
religious issue, but whether it is sexist or not is logico-semantic based on
the definition of the word.

>It's anti
>christian to impose the secular doctrines of disorder and false
>authority spawned by shrinks and wizards... upon America. 

Only in your mind.

>Why all these women so miffed at Mr. Knight for expressing his views?

Because he is a nincompoop.

>Apparently they have never learned that not all men can be
>bossed around ...

You mean like Adam was when Eve told him to eat the apple?

lojbab



More information about the Neur-sci mailing list