brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

Jet thatjetnospam at yahoo.com
Fri Jul 19 02:18:00 EST 2002



John Knight wrote:
> 
> "Thalamus" <zhil at online.no> wrote in message
> news:4SEZ8.446$sR2.9177 at news4.ulv.nextra.no...
> > "Cary Kittrell" <cary at afone.as.arizona.edu> skrev i melding
> > news:ah73mn$dr3$1 at oasis.ccit.arizona.edu...
> > > In article  "Thalamus" <zhil at online.no> writes:
> > > Well, first off, Jet, allow me to apologize for this excresence
> > > on the fundament of my own race.  He's the idiot cousin we keep
> > > locked in the attic.
> >
> > I don't know what you have locked in your attic.
> > And what have your attic anything to do with the crime-stats that I
> > presented, I don't know.
> > Besides the factoids thta I presented can't be refuted - I'm using the
> FBI,
> > the Justice Department etc. etc. and all you can come up with are Ad
> Hominem
> > insults.
> > Shows us what a weak-minded idiot you are, CK.
> > If you want to try me, grab some factoids; which can't be refuted; and
> show
> > me that I'm wrong, if you can (hypocrite).
> >
> 
> I'm telling you, Brian, they're utterly incapable of the kind of discourse
> you can present, which is why feminazis always resort to these ad hominems.
> There's a slight chance that they understand the problem, and are being
> inflammatory just to head off the discussions, as jews always do.
> 
> > > Formalities aside, I have to wonder just exactly what:
> > >
> > > < Here's the crime-stats and other data about your inferior race.
> > >
> > > all that has to do with her criticism of John's "findings"
> > > in regard to the male-female debate that the rest of us
> > > (pay attention now, eh?) are actually engaged in.
> >
> > when you cut-and-paste, it can easily be confusing for such a small mind
> as
> > yours, CK ?
> > She said, and I quote (something you should learn):
> > "Ah, so you are a racist and a woman hater. Must really piss you off that
> > this BLACK WOMAN can do basic algebra and you can't."
> >
> > And I threw facts about her race back into her ugly monkey-face.
> >
> > > I don't suppose it could be that you're ill-equipped to debate
> > > her face to face, so you resort to screaming magic hate-words
> > > in the hope that no one will notice you're changing the subject?
> >
> > Pure B.S, CK, and I think people here will agree, that once you bring up
> > racism, then you have to expect factoids to be played onto the arena of
> > debate.
> > If people are small minded, they might object to my use of real data, as
> it
> > would damage their self-esteem.
> > Keep playing a looser, looser - that way I'll steamroll right over you,
> > blitzkrieg-style.
> >
> 
> Nigger women really can't do algebra.

I do algebra just fine, much, much better than you. I'm not the one
claiming that .75x=70% and  .25x=30%.

You can't answer question H04.

As soon as I pointed these things out, you had nothing left but to call
me nigger, and post irrelevant stats.

J

  The creme de la creme of nigger women
> score only 404 on GRE quantitative, which is a far lower than someone would
> get if all they could do is add and subtract.  A score of 475 is what
> someone would get if they just rememberd a few math principles, and guessed
> on all the questions, so nigger women didn't even do that.
> 
> Do they believe these fairy tales?  It's hard to believe they do--but then
> again ...'
> 
> John Knight



More information about the Neur-sci mailing list