brain sizes: Einstein's and women's
lojbab at lojban.org
Fri Jul 19 11:19:07 EST 2002
"John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote:
>This is preposterous. The essence of Darwinism, the reason that Americans
>reject it in great numbers, the reason it's a sick joke, is that it attempts
>to discredit 2,000 years of science which taught that God created life
Science has NEVER taught that, because God has nothing to do with science.
Furthermore, science as a discipline did not exist for all of those 2000
years, but emerged as a product of the late Middle Ages and the Renaissance.
>"Human beings have developed over millions of years from less advanced forms
>of life, but God guided this process" is NOT the "theory" of evolution,
You wouldn't know the theory of evolution if it bit you.
"Human beings have developed over millions of years from less advanced forms
of life" is a reasonable statement of the theory of evolution. Any role of
God is irrelevant to the theory, so you can believe whatever you want about
God, but if you accept the above quote, you are accepting evolution.
>There's no way that you didn't know that Darwin's theory of natural
>selection is a rejection of creation.
It is not.
You are a rejection of humanity.
>You clearly already knew that the
>instant a person believes that God was involved in creating life, he rejects
False, because natural selection says NOTHING about how life was created.
>You must be aware that when you combine "God guided this
>process" with "from less advanced forms of life", you do NOT have TOE,
What makes YOU the authority on what the theory of evolution says, and not
the evolutionary scientists themselves? THEY say that the role of God is
irrelevant to whether it is the theory of evolution. YOU are WRONG!
>Are you going to now claim that Darwin wasn't an "evolutionist"? Is this
>your scam? His "Origin of Species" makes PRECISELY that claim.
Lets see the words where Darwin himself says that God did NOT do it.
More information about the Neur-sci