brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

John Knight johnknight at usa.com
Sat Jul 20 12:40:39 EST 2002


"Thalamus" <zhil at online.no> wrote in message
news:GnXZ8.639$Py1.11352 at news2.ulv.nextra.no...
> "Jet" <thatjetnospam at yahoo.com> skrev i melding
> news:3D37C00B.743DB7E3 at yahoo.com...
> > I do algebra just fine, much, much better than you. I'm not the one
> > claiming that .75x=70% and  .25x=30%.
> >
> > You can't answer question H04.
> >
> > As soon as I pointed these things out, you had nothing left but to call
> > me nigger, and post irrelevant stats.


When you act, whine, and "think" like a nigger, don't get surprised if
people think you're a nigger.  You're certainly as stupid as a nigger,
particularly if you think Brian posted "irrelevant stats".  Even if you
don't understand why they're very relevant to a discussion of intelligence
and brain size, much of the world understands precisely why they are [hint:
the reason niggers have such high crime rates is because they have such
small brain cell counts].

John Knight





>
> I think that this can hardly be called irrelevant:
> http://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/condition98/c9818a01.html
> And I'll humiliate you totally, for read THIS:
> "Average mathematics proficiency (scale score) by race/ethnicity and age:
> 1973-1996
>                       White                             Black
> Hispanic
> Year    Age9 Age13 Age17 Age9 Age13 Age17 Age9 Age13 Age17
> 1973     225    274    310     190    228     270       202   239    277
> 1978     224    272    306     192    230     268       203   238    276
> 1982     224    274    304     195    240     272       204   252    277
> 1986     227    274    308     202    249     279       205   254    283
> 1990     235    276    310     208    250     289       214   255    284
> 1992     235    279    312     208    250     286       212   259    292
> 1994     237    281    312     212    252     286       210   256    291
> 1996     237    281    312     212    252     286       215   256    292"
>
> Now, it seems that the nigger achieved as an 17-year old on par with White
> 13-year old kids (IE check the numbers for 1973,1978 and 1982).
> It seems that they in fact have achieved a little better than those pesky
> 13-year old White kids later on, but the divide is still there.
>
> So, you loose Nigger, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> !!!!!!!!!
> N I G G E R !!!!!
>
> Lets see how they do in science:
> http://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/condition98/c9819a01.html
> Science proficiency among 9, 13 and 17-year-olds, based on race/ethnicity.
>
> Well surprise surprise; the Nigger earns it name every day.
> You're actually doing WORSE in science !!!
> That means, 17 year old Niggers are WORSE than 13-year old White KIDS !!!!
> (Check the entire row for White kids 13 years old vs Niggers 17 years
old).
>
> Brian
> http://www.transtopia.org
> "Welcome to Transtopia. Cult of the Technocalypse. Portal to digital
Heaven
> & Hell. Citadel of radically progressive thought. Realm of future gods."
> ****Niggers Not Welcome****
>
>





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list