TD E/I-minimization CLARIFICATION

Jimbo jimbodino at nsyahoo.com
Sat Jul 20 21:24:06 EST 2002


"Kenneth Collins" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:hXl_8.41999$Iu6.2394787 at bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Jimbo wrote in message ...
> >
> >"Kenneth Collins" <k.p.collins at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> >news:NQg_8.112483$UT.7246917 at bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> >>[...]
> >>
> >> as Lincoln said, "A man has not time to spend half his life in
quarrels."
> >>
> >> k. p. collins
> >>
> >
> >Lincoln must have been referring to someone other than you.
>
> i've always viewed it as Lincoln's speaking with respect to his own
> experience, and i agree with the deeper-stuff inherent.
>
> let's see. i've spent about 20 minutes, up to now, responding to your
> posts'.
>
> there's Precious energy-flow in-there, but it's only about 1/(1.5 * 10 ^
6)
> of my Life, hardly "half", so 'you' can't be asserting, through Lincoln,
> with respect to me.
>
> for all i know, 'you' might be the work of some junior programmer who's
'on
> a lark' with respect to some "Elissa"-type of 'analysis'.
>
> can't tell, but the complete absence of Logic in "your" posts does
coincide.
>
> actually, what i've been doing is giving folks who do such sufficient
> 'triangulation' data with respect to "your" pseudo-posting-address.
>
> not that i care with respect to such.
>
> but, perhaps, in "your" surmise with respect to Lincoln's expression,
> "you're" addressing more than only the msgs we've exchanged?
>
> not that "you'd" own such, because doing so would be an admission that
> "you're" 'stalking' me online.
>
> another alternative is that "you're" just 'fishing' for information with
> respect to 'me'.
>
> so, i'll 'play-along', a bit.
>
> what i'm actually doing, over the long term, is going over the stuff
that's
> been in AoK all along, 'rolling-it-around', holding up this or that facet
in
> this or that light, so that folks who've an interest, can receive insight
> into its deeper stuff within the integrated whole. i'm 'conducting a tour'
> beneath the 'level' of AoK's 'language'-interface.
>
> if 'you' haven't noticed, folks tend not to respond to my posts, so, if
> NDT's concepts're going to be communicated, then i've got to do it as i'm
> doing it.
>
> just now, i am spending a lot of 'time' online, mostly because i've not
been
> able to find employment, so i'm free to do so, and want to do so, as much
as
> i can, before i've got to stuff my laundry bag, and "hit the road, Jack".
>
> it's 'funny' that i can't find employment.
>
> in a narrow spectrum of computing, i'm right up there with the best there
is
> [=not= in terms of 'elegance' and 'style'. just in terms of rooting-out
> what's in-there].
>
> can't find a job, though.
>
> too old?
>
> or is everyone 'afraid' of becoming 'associated' with me?
>
> don't know.
>
> all i know is i can't find employment.
>
> so the 'time' i have, before the bottom-drops-out, is Precious to me.
>
> so, i'd appreciate it if "you'd" either find Logic, or just 'go away'.
>
> no hard feelings.
>
> "you" don't have to 'pry' stuff out of me. i've already fulfilled my
> Responsibility with respect to such 'Disclosure'.
>
> "you" don't have to 'worry'.
>
> i won't 'get away with' anything.
>
> so, go on the 'tour', or not, but please don't 'redirect' the Precious
stuff
> that's left to me.
>
> k. p. collins
>

Paranoia is treatable.






More information about the Neur-sci mailing list