k.p.collins at ~worldnet.att.net
Tue Jul 23 17:37:40 EST 2002
i must Apologize to you, if, in prior posts, i 'steered' you 'wrong'.
the main thing that i was referring to, when i discussed "EEG-type" studies
was the need to acquire rigorously-arrayed data, and to cross-correlate it
with everything else with respect to which it can be cross-correlated,
including via the topological 'twists' and 'turns' of the neural topology.
maintaining the spatial geometrical] rigor is the most-important thing.
EEG is rather imprecise in this regard, so it's better to record the
analogous data via arrays of electrodes.
i've no lab, so i can't help with specific technique. i developed this view
while studying the literature with respect to single-unit recording, piecing
together a version of the 'array' data, over 'time'.
it wasn't long before i began 'wondering' why no one was [back then; 1970s]
using arrays of recording electrodes.
such arrays came into use during the 1980s.
the main difficulty with them is that the denser the recording array, the
more it's placement tends to destroy the natural Geometry [neural topology],
so it can confound itself. there's always some of this, even with single
perhaps some of this can be controlled for via electrode, and non-electrode,
EEG, but this, too, will be confounded when the electrodes are in-place.
i wanted to give you this info, and to Apologize to you for not just saying
"spatial-array-data" in my prior posts, because the 'dream' inherent in your
overall approach is Splendid, as is your professed dedication to its
i Engourage you, from my 'Heart'.
know that the course you've chosen is 'Difficult', demanding, and requires
pains-taking deta-base construction with respect to the 3-D neural Topology.
but, if you only stick with it, and if you work with sustained rigor, your
success is guaranteed.
go for it.
k. p. collins
Jean-Etienne Poirrier wrote in message ...
>OK, I know I shouldn't have done things the way I did.
>In fact, my B.Sc. thesis promoter is focused on 2-D electrophoresis. So I
>did gels with samples I received from elsewhere. Then Carlyle Smith (Trent
>University) came and show us how to record EEG from rats (but he didn't
>stay for a long time). So I trained and recorded my own rats.
>Now I have rats EEG and 2-D gels with proteins. I can analyse my gels with
>help from my promoter. Since Carlyle Smith went back to Canada, I am left
>alone to analyse my EEG. I can ask physician how they do in humans. But I
>wonder if it's different or not in rats.
>Since I plan to do a Ph.D. on the same subject, I would like to learn more
>about rat EEG. That's why I'm asking for help and papers references.
>"Joseph Martin III" <joseph.martin54 at verizon.net> wrote in
>news:tRC_8.15616$927.10735 at nwrddc01.gnilink.net:
>> "Jean-Etienne Poirrier" <jepoirrier at nospam.student.ulg.ac.be> wrote in
>> message news:Xns9252C39C7FC1jepoirrierstudentulg at 184.108.40.206...
>>> I am a B.Sc. student at the university of Liege (Belgium) doing my
>>> B.Sc. thesis on protein expression in rats hippocampus. For a part of
>>> my job, I had to record rat sleep. A kind physician recording EEG in
>>> humans show me how to record. But now I have raw data, I cannot find
>>> how to interpret them.
>>> Hopefully, I look at both the recording and the rat. So I know when
>>> he's asleep and when he's awake. But that's all :-(
>>> Could someone give me some advice, web links, publications, articles,
>>> references ?
>>> Many thanks in advance,
>>> Jean-Etienne Poirrier
>> I know this may be a silly question, and perhaps it is more food for
>> thought in any future resarch you might undertake....
>> why would you do research involving EEG's without from the beginning
>> knowing how you would analyze the data?
More information about the Neur-sci