brain sizes: Einstein's and women's

Parse Tree parsetree at hotmail.com
Thu Jul 25 20:45:35 EST 2002


"John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
news:lE109.23236$Fq6.2520918 at news2.west.cox.net...
>
> "The 9th Witch" <appalachian_witch at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ahpnbl$vc54o$1 at ID-131540.news.dfncis.de...
> >
> > John Knight <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
> > news:qCY%8.20847$Fq6.2438003 at news2.west.cox.net...
> > >
> > > "Parse Tree" <parsetree at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:JjC%8.10452$sb5.1054617 at news20.bellglobal.com...
> >
> > >
> > > Again, it's your "opinion" that the questions were "ambiguous", but
the
> > > simple fact is that you can't argue they weren't as clear as a bell to
> > those
> > > who understood the problem, can you?
> > >
> > > So is H04 "ambiguous", or is it just that missing 3 1/2 billion brain
> > cells
> > > makes it seem that way?
> >
> > Parse Tree is a man, you stupid FUCK.
>
> Impossible!  Not even pathetically feminized men are this bad.  Not even
> estrogen drenched, steroid pumped, ritalin packed male graduates of our
> feminized "school" system are this bad.

I think you're just a tad upset that I PROVED that your probabilities were
wrong.





More information about the Neur-sci mailing list