brain sizes: Einstein's and women's
JDay123 at BellSouth.com
Fri Jul 26 18:00:53 EST 2002
In alt.education Re: brain sizes: Einstein's and women's,
Bob LeChevalier wrote...
>JDay123 at BellSouth.com (Jd) wrote:
>>In alt.education Re: brain sizes: Einstein's and women's,
>>>The reason they refer to Hebrew is because it's the language used
>>>for the Old Testament of the Bible and the language used in
>>>Jesus' lifetime, where he lived.
>>>I think you'll find that the person who wrote the article is a Christian.
>>No. A Cristian would never even think of such things so that's not
>>even a possibility.
>O ye of little imagination. Christians are not *all* so unimaginative as you
>are, and some of us think of some very strange things. And what's more, some
>of us even write them down.
>> In fact, it's far more likely that that person is a Jew posing as a
>> 1) the statements were antichrist in spirit
>> 2) antichrist spirits often try to blend in with Christians as they
>>did in the first Church where they appeared in their first
>That is a rather meager bit of evidence that someone is "a Jew posing as a
>Christian". If they were "posing" or "trying to blend in" they would be
>unlikely to want to give themselves away by such an overt "antichrist"
>statement, since obviously such behavior does not make them blend in.
Nevertheless, that person is "more likely" to be a Jew than a
Christian in my opinion. Why is it that you get so upset when I
write down my opinion yet you applaud when imposters write down
their opinions? I think you liberals would take away free speech if
it were possible, and only allowing cursing, obscenities, and porno
>> 3) Jews always point to the Hebrew language as if it's icing on the
>>cake when making a point. Believe me, I've encountered this many
>Does that mean that John Knight is a Jew, since he often pulls out his
>Strong's and misuses a Hebrew word in trying to make a point?
No. Jews will tell you that the requirement for being Jewish is to
have a Jewish mother. I can assure you, Mr. Knight doesn't have a
The Hebrew languange ploy they use is just that, a ploy. Jews use
that ploy to bluff unwary gentiles (in religious discussions) into
thinking that translational errors keep them (gentiles) from
discovering truth. However, since Jews here think in English, they
subject themselves to their own ploy unknowingly.
The kicker however, is that since the NT was written in Hellenistic
Greek and not Hebrew, Jews that use the "ploy" must learn Greek and
study the NT before criticizing the NT, if they subject themselves
to their own standard. But they don't and won't.
Now below, I've re-quoted what Angilion said. See if you can catch
the subtle Hebrew language ploy... along with the error:
"The reason they refer to Hebrew is because it's the language
used for the Old Testament of the Bible and the language used in
Jesus' lifetime, where he lived."
...see that? The language they used in Jesus' lifetime wasn't even
Hebrew way back then, it was Hellenistic Greek (which is different
from classical Greek). Perhaps you and Angilion were also ignorant
of the fact that Galilean gentiles 20 centuries ago didn't speak
ancient Hebrew either.
Matthew 4:13-14 And leaving Nazareth, he came and dwelt in
Capernaum, which is upon the sea coast, in the borders of Zabulon
and Nephthalim: That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by
Esaias the prophet, saying,
Mathew 4:15-16 The land of Zabulon, and the land of Nephthalim, by
the way of the sea, beyond Jordan, Galilee of the Gentiles; The
people which sat in darkness saw great light; and to them which sat
in the region and shadow of death light is sprung up.
In fact, that particular greek dialect was the language of choice
for the Jews of 332 B.C. who lived in Alexandria Egypt (which was
the cultural capital of the Greek Empire). Jews occupied 1/4 of
Alexandria and that was the place where the Hebrew scriptures were
first translated (into Greek, ~285 B.C.). That's a good 3 centuries
before Jesus and proves that Hebrew wasn't the language of choice by
scholars way back then.
However, historical revisionists have that first translation into
greek dated at "before 100 A.D." Guess why they picked 100 A.D.?
>> 4) ADL type liberal Jews want to disarm America and legalizing
>>tetrahydrocanabanolis would make that task a great deal easier.
>What does being armed have to do with being Christian? Do you really think
>you can defeat Satan with a gun?
If you are "armed" it means that you are fundamentally opposed to
the Neo-Nazi gun control legislation ADL liberals and other liberals
are "for". Even some among Orthodox Jews publically oppose the ADL
for this very reason and more. One Orthodox postion is that
protection of human life (which would include gun ownership) is
mandated in the Torah. Just a few months ago the Israeli Rabbinate
ruled that it was ok for observant Jews to carry guns on the sabbath
To me, this represents a shift away from ADL liberalism towards
conservative (and Constitutional) values and freedoms. Obviously,
Jewry must've been putting pressure on the Israeli Rabbinate for
such a decision to have been made public. Also, this means (to me)
that Jews may be shifting away from you and your femiNazi
girlfriends who are probably lesbians in disguise.
>>A nation of pudgy little 'hooked' couch potatoes who's main desires
>>are watching movies on weekends before and after having sex, would
>>offer very little resistance.
>I know a few Christians like that. They may be hooked on alcohol, tobacco
>caffeine, and other legal drugs, but they are hooked nonetheless.
>> 6) Real Christians know these things.
>This "real Christian" knows otherwise.
Well, you should "know better". And so should Angilion.
More information about the Neur-sci