brain sizes: Einstein's and women's
johnknight at usa.com
Sat Jul 27 21:02:26 EST 2002
"Shadow Dancer" <insomniac at winterslight.org> wrote in message
news:ahrtl1$vamk5$1 at ID-150265.news.dfncis.de...
> "John Knight" <johnknight at usa.com> wrote in message
> news:eme09.25512$Fq6.2721104 at news2.west.cox.net...
> > "Parse Tree" <parsetree at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:5Xs_8.11402$o7.2411397 at news20.bellglobal.com...
> > > > Congratulations for failing to figure this out. The Japanese love
> > > > Through patriarchy, Japanese women rose to family incomes twice ours
> > from
> > > a
> > > > fifth of ours just 4 decades ago. This 10x swing was mostly because
> > > our
> > > > drop in fortunes rather than their dramatic increase.
> > >
> > > This is not true. Japan had immense economic growth. A 10x swing
> > > blamed on America's decline could only exist if families were broken
> > > more than 2 parts. Are you suggesting that there are no dual income
> > > families, let alone two parent families, and that the first born of
> > > family starts working as soon as they're out of the womb?
> > >
> > >
> > This mythology that "dual income families" improved anything or
> > family incomes is a cruel joke, and the joke's on you feminazis.
> > The mostly one income families in the US in 1970 had household
> > power THREE TIMES what these "dual income families" have today. The
> > Japanese households which earn two and three times our "dual income
> > families" today are almost exclusively one income families. Where's the
> > beef?
> > Why? Because it requires the positive productivity of 8 male workers in
> > American labor force just to make up for the negative productivity of
> > female worker. There's no other way this could happen.
> > John Knight
> Provide references, and not from the christian party site.
Sorry, all requests for free research (which we now understand to be so
neccessary when ONE THIRD ...) must be funneled through The Christian Party.
But you're in luck--the urls at http://christianparty.net/familyincomes.htm
are direct references to the original FEDERAL data (which because of CYA may
not be the most accurate, but it
will put you in the ballpark).
More information about the Neur-sci